Immigrants Become the New Media Makers for a New Europe
![]()
Photo: German journalist, Chadi Bahouth of New Dutch Media, is
of Palestinian and Lebanese descent. He advocates for the rights of
immigrants in Germany. He holds a postcard from De-Bug's "Arriving and Becoming Project."
PRAGUE, Czech Republic--Images flash on the big screen of a
Vietnamese teen breakdancer shapeshifting his body while his voice
narrates his life. I’ve seen these images, these movements, before back
home in San Jose, Calif., but this is the first time I’ve heard a
Vietnamese hip-hopper speaking Czech.
We are at the Prague
Institute, where media producers and immigrant advocates from all over
Europe are sharing how they are tapping into the personal story of new
European communities to penetrate political, social and cultural
divides.
We are here representing New America Media (NAM) and De-Bug, which
was invited to participate in the dialogue as an overseas contributor.
NAM, too, is walking a similar path of creating media stages for the
unheard in a changing, and contentious political climate for immigrants.
Personal Stories of Immigration
The color, age
and languages heard on the streets of Europe are being re-imagined by
the infusion of new immigrant populations. In many ways the people
gathered here in Prague will determine the future of the continent.
As
Europe undergoes massive demographic changes, it stands at a
fork-in-the-road moment. Either its nations will retreat into fractured,
xenophobic fear of the other, or they will embrace the value added of a
new diversity. Media, through their ability to communicate the personal
stories of immigration, may determine which road is chosen.
The
video we are watching is of a young man living in Prague, who is
telling the story of his parents’ migration here. It was produced by a
local Czech social service agency, which serves the large, though less
integrated, Vietnamese community. The woman sitting next to me whispers
to herself when she hears him speak--“Czech in Vietnamese skin,” she
says. The mini-documentary, called “A Better Life,” tells the story of
immigrants in the Czech Republic, profiling the lives of Vietnamese,
Albanian and Russian immigrants.
The discussion after the film
sparks a heated debate from the audience. They are not just spectators,
but rather stakeholders invested in this practice of producing media to
change societies. They are practitioners from the Czech Republic, the
Netherlands, England and Germany, who have been examining and creating
media as a vehicle for a larger purpose – inclusion of communities that
otherwise have been invisible.
Just two weeks prior, these groups, under a collaborative effort called MediaforUS
ran its largest effort to date – an eight-page insert of stories
written by new migrants in eight different countries and languages
through the print publication called the “Metro.” They reached 5 million
readers.
A sister organization of MediaforUS called Media4Me
is the more localized version of the effort, concentrating on using
media platforms within a city, or even neighborhood, to dissolve
stereotypes and promote a more intimate understanding of each other.
Connecting Disconnected Communities
Through the Multikulturni Centrum Praha
(Prague Multicultural Center), migrant communities are creating
television shows for their municipal TV channel, and running summer
schools for young migrants to become multimedia journalists –
communicators of the new Europe.
It is new media as much as
traditional media that is allowing this generation of multicultural
journalists to serve the larger purpose of connecting otherwise
disconnected communities.
In England, Media4Me created a YouTube
project, online radio show and online photo gallery for residents to
identify what aspects of their multicultural, multilingual, neighborhood
they wanted changed. It was civic engagement without the town-hall
meeting, expect perhaps a virtual one. Once larger news outlets picked
up on the efforts, elected officials were forced to respond.
Outside
of creating media, migrant journalists in Europe are challenging the
language and visual depictions of immigrant communities used by
politicians and mainstream media as a key battleground.
Anti-Immigrant Reaction
According
to the German National Statistics Office, one out of every eight
residents of Germany is foreign-born. That number, as in many European
countries, is rising, along with the cache of anti-immigrant sentiment.
In Germany, right-wing political parties have gained ground by espousing anti-Muslim platforms. Neue Duetsche Medianmacher (New German Media, or NDM) is an association of journalists of migrant
ancestry, who are pushing media producers to respect the rights and
nationality of Germans with migrant heritages.
Decision makers
in editorial boardrooms and production suites are deciding on ways to
identify and describe migrant communities. Those discussions speak to a
more fundamental national question – who is German?
NDM, which
says only two percent of all journalists there are of migrant ancestry,
have challenged the major national papers. For instance, the group has
questioned those mainstream media outlets when they call a German a
“foreigner,” even though the person carries a German passport. NDM has
also called out racist depiction of Muslims.
The conversation,
and the role of media as a facilitator of either fear or inclusion, is a
familiar one by immigrant advocates in the United States, who have had
an active campaign to stop the major media from using the term “illegal”
when referring to undocumented immigrants.
These journalists
know -- as migrant communities do all over the world – that media
matters. Indeed, it may be the sole historical force that allows
populations with less political capital to actually shape their futures
within a larger new homeland.
Comments
Indeed, the Dutch right wing extremists use the same kind of racist/fascist arguments as the Germans, based on a common view of ethnic nationalism. This would be worth a separate mention, but you would have to cite it to different sources, as it is a different country with different political parties and their media. I have to regret to say that also the US is not free of such tendencies, in particular from the members of the white protestant majority, which also formed a right wing with ethnic-nationalist tendencies. They think that America has to be dominated by white-christian culture, just like their European counterparts in fringe parties and on the fringe of established conservative-nationalist parties. It is as if the history repeats itself, over and over. In Germany the witnesses of the Nazi horrors are dying out, and everything starts again, every 70 years. It are young and fanatic people, who are uprooted in their own culture, lacking a knowledge of history and past ideologies, so they fall in the trap again. Note that original Nazis were also a anti-bourgeoise youth ideology, the SS-men and the like being recruited at age 17-21 yrs from people without much cultural exposure, then trained to believe in themselves being part of an elite.
Post a comment
